<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Medical Malpractice Attorney Information</title>
	<atom:link href="http://medicalmalpracticeattorneyinfo.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://medicalmalpracticeattorneyinfo.com</link>
	<description>Your Go To Site For Medical Malpractice Information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 10:20:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Successful Trial Techniques &#8211; Using Technology In The Courtroom</title>
		<link>http://medicalmalpracticeattorneyinfo.com/successful-trial-techniques-using-technology-in-the-courtroom/</link>
		<comments>http://medicalmalpracticeattorneyinfo.com/successful-trial-techniques-using-technology-in-the-courtroom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 10:20:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Medical Malpractice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawyer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://medicalmalpracticeattorneyinfo.com/successful-trial-techniques-using-technology-in-the-courtroom/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As an experienced Baltimore, Maryland   medical malpractice  lawyer, I am often asked what contributes to my success.  Certainly hard work comes first.  But there are also various ways that can improve the odds of being successful in the courtroom.  One way is to use computerized technology in the courtroom. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://medicalmalpracticeattorneyinfo.com/successful-trial-techniques-using-technology-in-the-courtroom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Informed Consent Malpractice</title>
		<link>http://medicalmalpracticeattorneyinfo.com/informed-consent-malpractice/</link>
		<comments>http://medicalmalpracticeattorneyinfo.com/informed-consent-malpractice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 10:20:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Medical Malpractice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doctors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[risks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://medicalmalpracticeattorneyinfo.com/informed-consent-malpractice/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Maryland Court of Appeals has issued a new decision on the law of informed consent in Maryland medical malpractice cases.  According to the court, doctors must inform patients not only of the risks of procedures but also the potential consequences of forgoing a medical procedure. The decision is a victory for patient’s rights. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://medicalmalpracticeattorneyinfo.com/informed-consent-malpractice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vacuum Extractor Malpractice</title>
		<link>http://medicalmalpracticeattorneyinfo.com/vacuum-extractor-malpractice/</link>
		<comments>http://medicalmalpracticeattorneyinfo.com/vacuum-extractor-malpractice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 10:20:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Medical Malpractice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[death]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[die]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[risks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://medicalmalpracticeattorneyinfo.com/vacuum-extractor-malpractice/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Montgomery County jury has awarded $1.85 million to the parents of a baby who died three days after delivery from complications of internal bleeding caused by the method of delivery.  The women arrived at Frederick Memorial Hospital for a scheduled, induced labor 41 weeks into her pregnancy.  She pushed for three hours [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://medicalmalpracticeattorneyinfo.com/vacuum-extractor-malpractice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sacramento Plaintiff Must Prove Causation In Medical Malpractice Action, Part 4 of 4</title>
		<link>http://medicalmalpracticeattorneyinfo.com/sacramento-plaintiff-must-prove-causation-in-medical-malpractice-action-part-4-of-4/</link>
		<comments>http://medicalmalpracticeattorneyinfo.com/sacramento-plaintiff-must-prove-causation-in-medical-malpractice-action-part-4-of-4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 10:20:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Medical Malpractice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawyer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://medicalmalpracticeattorneyinfo.com/sacramento-plaintiff-must-prove-causation-in-medical-malpractice-action-part-4-of-4/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(Please note: the names and locations of all parties have been changed to protect the confidentiality of this medical malpractice case and its proceedings.)
The following four blog entries follow-up the previous two entries from July.  These entries address the same issues, but do so from the defense side.  By comparing the entries readers [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://medicalmalpracticeattorneyinfo.com/sacramento-plaintiff-must-prove-causation-in-medical-malpractice-action-part-4-of-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Expert Testimony Required In Sacramento Medical Malpractice Case,Part 3 of 4</title>
		<link>http://medicalmalpracticeattorneyinfo.com/expert-testimony-required-in-sacramento-medical-malpractice-casepart-3-of-4/</link>
		<comments>http://medicalmalpracticeattorneyinfo.com/expert-testimony-required-in-sacramento-medical-malpractice-casepart-3-of-4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 11:28:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Medical Malpractice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[injury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawyer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://medicalmalpracticeattorneyinfo.com/expert-testimony-required-in-sacramento-medical-malpractice-casepart-3-of-4/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(Please note: the names and locations of all parties have been changed to protect the confidentiality of this medical malpractice case and its proceedings.)
The following four blog entries follow-up the previous two entries from July.  These entries address the same issues, but do so from the defense side.  By comparing the entries readers [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://medicalmalpracticeattorneyinfo.com/expert-testimony-required-in-sacramento-medical-malpractice-casepart-3-of-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Man From West Sacramento Files Medical Malpractice Action, Part 2 of 4</title>
		<link>http://medicalmalpracticeattorneyinfo.com/man-from-west-sacramento-files-medical-malpractice-action-part-2-of-4/</link>
		<comments>http://medicalmalpracticeattorneyinfo.com/man-from-west-sacramento-files-medical-malpractice-action-part-2-of-4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 11:28:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Medical Malpractice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawyer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://medicalmalpracticeattorneyinfo.com/man-from-west-sacramento-files-medical-malpractice-action-part-2-of-4/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(Please note: the names and locations of all parties have been changed to protect the confidentiality of this medical malpractice case and its proceedings.)
The following four blog entries follow-up the previous two entries from July.  These entries address the same issues, but do so from the defense side.  By comparing the entries readers [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://medicalmalpracticeattorneyinfo.com/man-from-west-sacramento-files-medical-malpractice-action-part-2-of-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sacramento Doctors Sued For Malpractice, Part 1 of 4</title>
		<link>http://medicalmalpracticeattorneyinfo.com/sacramento-doctors-sued-for-malpractice-part-1-of-4/</link>
		<comments>http://medicalmalpracticeattorneyinfo.com/sacramento-doctors-sued-for-malpractice-part-1-of-4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 11:28:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Medical Malpractice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doctors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[injury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawyer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://medicalmalpracticeattorneyinfo.com/sacramento-doctors-sued-for-malpractice-part-1-of-4/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(Please note: the names and locations of all parties have been changed to protect the confidentiality of this medical malpractice case and its proceedings.)
The following blog entries follow-up the previous two entries from July.  These entries address the same issues, but do so from the defense side.  By comparing the entries readers should [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://medicalmalpracticeattorneyinfo.com/sacramento-doctors-sued-for-malpractice-part-1-of-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Justice In Texas Points Out The Injustice Of The Law</title>
		<link>http://medicalmalpracticeattorneyinfo.com/justice-in-texas-points-out-the-injustice-of-the-law/</link>
		<comments>http://medicalmalpracticeattorneyinfo.com/justice-in-texas-points-out-the-injustice-of-the-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 11:28:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Medical Malpractice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doctors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[injury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patients]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://medicalmalpracticeattorneyinfo.com/justice-in-texas-points-out-the-injustice-of-the-law/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The first week of July in Harris County, Texas, a man who lost his leg from mid-thigh down, part of his right foot and all of his fingers received a verdict of $10 million. The man was injured after an allergic reaction to Heprin. Under the present law in Texas, he would have really received [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://medicalmalpracticeattorneyinfo.com/justice-in-texas-points-out-the-injustice-of-the-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Failure to properly report x-ray, CT or MRI results &#8211; Medical Malpractice</title>
		<link>http://medicalmalpracticeattorneyinfo.com/failure-to-properly-report-x-ray-ct-or-mri-results-medical-malpractice/</link>
		<comments>http://medicalmalpracticeattorneyinfo.com/failure-to-properly-report-x-ray-ct-or-mri-results-medical-malpractice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 20:44:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Medical Malpractice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doctors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawyer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://medicalmalpracticeattorneyinfo.com/failure-to-properly-report-x-ray-ct-or-mri-results-medical-malpractice/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An Indiana jury has issued a large verdict in a medical malpractice case last month, an unusual thing in a state where such judgments are rare.  The jury awarded the woman $5 million after miscommunication about X-rays led her to lose a portion of her stomach.  Due to caps on damages, the verdict [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://medicalmalpracticeattorneyinfo.com/failure-to-properly-report-x-ray-ct-or-mri-results-medical-malpractice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Failure to properly read and interpret / report x-ray, CT scan or MRI &#8211; Medical Malpractice</title>
		<link>http://medicalmalpracticeattorneyinfo.com/failure-to-properly-read-and-interpret-report-x-ray-ct-scan-or-mri-medical-malpractice/</link>
		<comments>http://medicalmalpracticeattorneyinfo.com/failure-to-properly-read-and-interpret-report-x-ray-ct-scan-or-mri-medical-malpractice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 20:44:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Medical Malpractice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[death]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doctors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surgery]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://medicalmalpracticeattorneyinfo.com/failure-to-properly-read-and-interpret-report-x-ray-ct-scan-or-mri-medical-malpractice/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An Indiana jury has awarded $5 million to a woman in a medical malpractice case that was caused by a misdiagnosis.  The woman, then 18, arrived at the emergency room with a ruptured diaphragm after playing softball.  But through several miscommunications about what was shown by x-rays, she was misdiagnosed with a urinary [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://medicalmalpracticeattorneyinfo.com/failure-to-properly-read-and-interpret-report-x-ray-ct-scan-or-mri-medical-malpractice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
